George W. Bush's most
recent state of the union address didn't contain the caliber of
bald-faced, smoking-gun lies that we have come to expect from him, like
the "sixteen words" in the last one (about Iraq supposedly seeking
uranium from "Africa"), but it was certainly replete with dishonesty
and misrepresentation. Disclaimer: The author in no way undertakes to
assure that the examples of dishonesty presented below constitute an
exhaustive list.
Bush
said: As we gather tonight, hundreds of thousands of American
servicemen
and women are deployed across the world in the war on terror. By
bringing hope
to the oppressed, and delivering justice to the violent, they are
making
America
more secure.
Response: Interesting
phrasing. “Delivering justice to the violent.” It
reminds me of
Bush’s epitaph on Uday and Qusay Hussein, that “their violent careers
ended in
justice” – a remark that prompted commentators all over the world to
add, “Yes, Texas
justice.” Assassination, search-and-destroy missions, a new global
Gulag
Archipelago, and war, whatever else they may be, are not exactly
synonymous
with “justice.
Bush
said: Americans are proving once again to be the hardest working
people in
the world.
Response: There
are many hard-working people in the world. But it is
indisputably
true that Americans are working harder than before. And this
administration
last year spearheaded attempted legislation that, according to the
Economic
Policy Institute, would deprive
eight million workers of their right to
overtime pay.
That legislation didn’t go through and the administration is now
pushing a new
plan that has similar problems. They are also advising
employers on how to
avoid paying overtime to employees who would qualify for it under the
new
legislation.
Bush
said: The first to see our determination were the Taliban, who made
Afghanistan
the primary training base of al-Qaida killers. As of this month, that
country
has a new constitution, guaranteeing free elections and full
participation by
women. Businesses are opening, health care centers are being
established, and
the boys and girls of Afghanistan
are back in school. With help from the new Afghan Army, our coalition
is
leading aggressive raids against surviving members of the Taliban and
al-Qaida.
The
truth: The 15 children killed in a single U.S.
bombing incident in November and the numerous others killed in
“search-and-destroy” missions are not in school. And, contrary to the
impression he wishes to give, the United
States
has
done virtually nothing
to reconstruct Afghanistan.
Bush
said: Since we last met in this chamber, combat forces of the
United
States, Great Britain, Australia, Poland and other countries enforced
the
demands of the United Nations, ended the rule of Saddam Hussein - and
the
people of Iraq are free. Having broken the Baathist regime, we face a
remnant
of violent Saddam supporters. Men who ran away from our troops in
battle are
now dispersed and attack from the shadows.
The
truth: There is no U.N. resolution calling for “regime change” in Iraq.
There is also no U.N. resolution authorizing the war. Tariq Ali quotes Iraqi
sources as saying there are over 40 factions in the Iraqi resistance,
only a
few of them Ba’athist or Saddam loyalist.
Bush
said: Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a
day,
and conducting an average of 180 raids every week. We are dealing with
these
thugs in Iraq,
just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.
Response:
These 180 raids per week make enemies of at least 1000 Iraqi families
every week.
Instead of knocking on the door and asking for a suspect, as would be
standard
in police operations, they start by breaking down the door. Then they
raid the
house, violate people’s (especially women’s) privacy, throw people down
on the
ground and humiliate them, and, according to Iraqi human rights
workers, in
virtually every raid they steal money and jewelry. Numerous eyewitness
accounts
of cases where people were shot when their homes were raided indicate
that
soldiers don’t even offer them medical attention until after they have
searched
the house.
Bush
said: The work of building a new Iraq
is hard, and it is right. And America
has always been willing to do what it takes for what is right.
The
truth: In Baghdad,
at least, there is no “building a new Iraq.”
After the much greater destruction of the Gulf War, under sanctions so
that no
foreign parts were available, the government of Iraq
restored power and telecommunications in three to four months. Here,
after nine
months of occupation, no one has even swept up the rubble from
bombed-out
buildings in Baghdad.
Electricity is at prewar capacity, in a country crippled by twelve
years of
sanctions and constant cannibalization of parts. Doctors at several
hospitals
that we visited had no hesitation in characterizing the situation as
significantly worse than it was under Saddam and the sanctions. They
also said
that they are still getting the Saddam-era medical stocks; no new
supplies are
being disbursed. There are shortages of basic antibiotics, operations
have to
be cancelled because of a lack of oxygen, and for lack of a few
thousand
dollars worth of equipment, doctors at Kadhimiyya Teaching Hospital
often have
sewage backing up on the floors of their operating theatre.
Bush
said: Last January, Iraq's
only law was the whim of one brutal man. Today our coalition is working
with
the Iraqi Governing Council to draft a basic law, with a bill of
rights.
Response:
One of the laws of the “brutal man” involved extremely light sentences
for
so-called “honor killings.” The incidence of these killings has
increased since
the war, but the CPA has not changed this law, so there is basically no
prosecution of these crimes. It’s not because the CPA is shy about
changing
laws with a stroke of his pen, Bremer bestowed the flat tax on Iraq.
Liberating women just isn’t one of his priorities.
Bush
said: We are working with Iraqis and the United Nations to prepare
for a
transition to full Iraqi sovereignty by the end of June. As democracy
takes
hold in Iraq,
the enemies of freedom will do all in their power to spread violence
and fear.
The
truth: The so-called “transfer of sovereignty” has been described
by many
political analysts in Iraq
as a “transfer from the right pocket to the left pocket.” The CPA is
giving no
power and no resources to the current interim Iraqi government, which
shows how
serious it is about that transfer. The Iraqi police, beyond being used
as
“human shields” by coalition forces, have no discernible function. When
we met
with the Baghdad
chief of police, who had just returned from two weeks in Tunisia,
there was not a single piece of paper on his desk, nor even empty “in”
and
“out” boxes for files and memos. After two weeks gone from his post, he
had
nothing better to do than meet with us for an hour – and we terminated
the
interview. The Iraqi Minister of Electricity has said on national TV
that he
has no money with which to fix the electrical power problem.
Bush
said: Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United
States
and Great
Britain
succeeded with Libya,
while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq
did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words
must be
credible - and no one can now doubt the word of America.
The
truth: Because of the sanctions and inspections, Iraq
was disarmed. In fact, it’s likely that after 1991 it had no WMD
worth
mentioning. Libya
had been moving toward a rapprochement with the United
States
for
years (see, e.g., The Colonel in His Labyrinth, Milton Viorst, Foreign
Affairs,
March, 1999 / April, 1999, p. 60) and this deal could easily have been
attained
by an offer to lift the U.N. and U.S.
sanctions on Libya
without need of a war on Iraq.
Libya’s
situation was desperate; among other things, its oil pumping capacity
had
fallen by a factor of two because of a lack of investment.
Nobody
now doubts the threats of America.
For a bully, perhaps there is no difference between that and the word
of America.
The latter is doubted severely. An interesting example – when Turkey
was haggling with the United
States
over
the price of cooperation in the war on Iraq
(this was before the parliament decided not to ratify the agreement).
After turning
town $26 billion over several years, Turkey agreed to $15 billion
mostly
up-front – as Paul Krugman pointed out (“Threats,
Promises, and Lies,” February
25, 2003, New York Times),
the reason is that the Turks, seeing the administration’s unkept
promises on
other things like AIDS spending, didn’t trust in anything but cash on
the
barrelhead. And Turkey
has been a close ally of the United
States
for
nearly 60 years.
And
let’s not even talk about the “word of America”
when it comes to lies about Iraq’s
WMD.
Bush
said: America
is committed to keeping the world's most dangerous weapons out of the
hands of
the world's most dangerous regimes.
Response: Iraq,
Iran,
and North
Korea
haven’t invaded anyone in a long time. Unfortunately, we are not
committed to
keeping “the world’s most dangerous weapons” out of the hands of the
most
genuinely dangerous regime, which has fought two wars in the past three
years,
in addition to minor things like trying to topple the elected leader of
Venezuela.
Bush
said: We are seeking all the facts - already the Kay report
identified
dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and
significant amounts of equipment that Iraq
concealed from the United Nations.
The
truth: Bush’s weasel words, like “weapons of mass
destruction-related
program activities,” tell the whole story here. Kay’s Iraq Survey Group
has
found no weapons and Kay has apparently quit
in disgust.
In fact, the United States has concealed more about Iraq’s weapons
programs
from the U.N. than Iraq did – remember the 12,000-page report Iraq
submitted on
December 7, 2002, which was carefully pruned down to under 4000 pages
before
the administration allowed everyone to see it?
Perhaps
the most naked display of unilateral arrogance, even more so than the
war on Iraq
itself, was the fact that, after the war, the United
States
violated UN Security Council Resolution 1441, which had been passed at
its own
behest, by preventing U.N. weapons inspectors from returning to Iraq
to finish the job. No explanation was ever given for substituting a U.S.
team, under the control of the U.S.
military, for the existing UNMOVIC and IAEA teams.
Bush
said: From the beginning, America
has sought international support for operations in Afghanistan
and Iraq,
and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however,
between
leading a coalition of many nations and submitting to the objections of
a few. America
will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.
The
truth: Yes, the United
States
sought international support, according to the famous doctrine revealed
in 1994
by Madeleine Albright – “We will act multilaterally when we can,
unilaterally
as we must” and again in 2001 by Donald Rumsfeld – “the mission
determines the
coalition and we must not let the coalition determine the mission.” In
other
words, the United
States
decided what is to be done and tries to browbeat others into
acquiescence or
agreement. And, of course, the implication that most of the world was
with us,
with a handful of exceptions (read France), is just the opposite of the
truth –
only four countries sent troops to the war, and of them, Poland and
Australia
were definitely acting against the will of a majority of their people.
Worldwide, opinion was almost uniform in condemning the war as an
imperialist
adventure.
Bush
said: I will send you a proposal to double the budget of the
National
Endowment for Democracy, and to focus its new work on the development
of free
elections, free markets, free press and free labor unions in the Middle
East.
Response: This
is not exactly what the NED does. In fact, it is
involved with the
subversion and manipulation of free elections and the replacement of
free labor
unions with corporate ones. In recent years, the NED manipulated the
2000
elections in Yugoslavia with roughly $20 million, a huge amount by
Yugoslav
standards and far more than the minuscule contributions from China that
caused
such a huge furor in 1996 in the United States; and spent $877,000 to
bring
coup plotters in Venezuela together, leading to the April 11, 2002,
attempted
coup against the democratically elected Hugo Chavez.
Bush said: And jobs are on the rise.
Response:
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in December 2003, 1,000
new jobs
were created. The unemployment rate fell because 309,000 people,
discouraged by
the almost total lack of prospects, gave up on searching for jobs. Over
2
million jobs have been lost under Bush.
Bush
said: To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good
doctors
doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical
lawsuits.
Response:
Taking advantage of the catastrophic state of health care in the United
States
to
once again push the corporate impunity program known as “tort reform.”
The
objective is not to reduce the financial load on doctors, but to reduce
the
load on insurance companies.
Bush
said: So tonight I call on team owners, union representatives,
coaches and
players to take the lead, to send the right signal, to get tough and to
get rid
of steroids now.
Response: Finally.
The truly important issues. Imagine the courage
involved in taking
such a controversial stand.
Bush
said: This year, some 600,000 inmates will be released from prison
back
into society. We know from long experience that if they can't find
work, or a
home, or help, they are much more likely to commit more crimes and
return to
prison. So tonight, I propose a four-year, $300 million Prisoner
Re-Entry
Initiative to expand job training and placement services, to provide
transitional housing, and to help newly released prisoners get
mentoring,
including from faith-based groups. America
is the land of the second chance - and when the gates of the prison
open, the
path ahead should lead to a better life.
Response: This
is truly brilliant. I can’t remember the last time a
Democratic
presidential candidate (except for Kucinich and Sharpton) actually
talked about
the genuine need to rehabilitate ex-prisoners. At one stroke, Bush
paints
himself as far more liberal, and compassionate, than the Democratic
mainstream.
Just three little problems: First, he seems to want to use government
money to
put ex-prisoners at the mercy of “faith-based groups.” I suppose that’s
one way
to recruit for the Christian Coalition. Second, with the economy
shedding jobs
like there’s no tomorrow, how exactly is he going to get work for
ex-prisoners?
Third, does anyone really believe this will happen? Does anyone
remember the
Freedom Corps, inaugurated with such stirring words in the 2002 SOU
address?