Home ArticlesLettersArchives
Empire Notes Needs Your Help
More info:
How to Help
|
Empire Notes
"We don't seek empires. We're not imperialistic. We never have been. I
can't imagine why you'd even ask the question." Donald Rumsfeld,
questioned by an al-Jazeera correspondent, April 29, 2003.
"No one can now doubt the word of America," George W. Bush, State of
the Union, January 20, 2004.
January 18, 2005 Radio Commentary -- The Situation in
Iraq Today
The people of Iraq are in an intolerable situation that, contrary to
official White House optimism, is steadily growing worse.
The U.N.-mandated elections scheduled for January 30 will be some of
the strangest in history. Taking the concept of the secret ballot one
step further, the majority of the political candidates have not
disclosed their names, for fear of assassination. Not only are they
giving people no sense of what policies they support, they’re not even
saying who they are. The few candidates who can get their message
across on Iraqi state TV have a huge advantage.
In Mosul, the electoral infrastructure is collapsing and elections
there are almost as questionable as in al-Anbar province, home of
flashpoints like Fallujah and Ramadi.
Attacks on the oil production and distribution infrastructure have been
stunningly successful. November saw a 36% drop in oil export revenue as
compared with October, and export levels in early January are even
lower, less than half of the normal level. Within the country, gas
lines last 24 hours or longer.
The U.S.-installed Allawi government has distinguished itself for its
brutality. Complains against the new Iraqi National Guard are legion;
some Iraqis think their conduct even worse than that of American
soldiers. Restrictions on press freedom are severe; al-Jazeera is still
effectively banned and other media outlets are constantly harassed. Its
deliberate targeting and humiliation of Sunni clerics and worshippers
has spread a climate of fear.
Ethnic polarization in Iraq is at a higher level than at any time since
the aftermath of the Iraqi intifada in 1991. The Kurd-Arab divide, a
serious problem from the beginning, has worsened; the Shi’a-Sunni
divide has exploded just within the past six months. And the election
is further widening it.
Reconstruction is going nowhere. Official reports suggest that
electrical power capacity has increased; in practice, it’s actually
going backward, with outages growing longer and more frequent. Plans to
actually start spending the monies allocated by Congress 16 months ago
have had few tangible results beyond filling the coffers of security
contractors. Although the sanctions are long over, the majority of
Iraqis remain fundamentally dependent on their government food ration.
If not for the massive increase in oil prices in the last two years,
Iraq would be facing a serious fiscal crisis just with regard to
day-to-day expenditures, forgetting about long-term reconstruction.
U.S. operations have become more violent and intrusive. Uncounted
thousands were killed in the November assault on Fallujah. Plans for
the city now involve turning it into what is basically a giant
concentration camp. And troops are currently conducting significant
sweeps in Mosul.
And, as of September, according to a study published in the Lancet,
excess mortality in Iraq after the regime change had amounted to
100,000 people. This was before the assault on Fallujah or the general
worsening of conditions in the past few months. By now, the number may
be 125,000.
Last but not least, the United States is considering the creation of
death squads to terrify the portion of the population that supports the
resistance, the logical next step after the introduction of arbitrary
detention, torture, and curfews.
All of this flows from the regime change. Not all was caused directly
by U.S. troops, but it was the United States that set in motion these
easily predictable dynamics. Although the political judgment of the
resistance is indefensible, many of these results occur whenever you
have armed resistance by a lightly armed civilian force against a
massive professional army. Crackdowns by the occupying army are always
justified as attempts to restore order.
There’s little doubt where the blame truly lies, though, with the
forces that unleashed this disaster and whose brutal conduct, from Abu
Ghraib to Fallujah, exacerbated it at every turn.
Somehow, all of this is to be made right by a meaningless election
where people will choose between candidates all of whom will end up
aiding and abetting the occupying forces and continue in turning Iraq
into a police state. George Bush recently said that the election
results in the United States had “ratified” his Iraq policy; no doubt,
that will be the line about election results in Iraq, no matter who
gets elected. The truth is that elections will change nothing about the
atrocity that is the occupation of Iraq.
|
"Report
from Baghdad -- Hospital Closings and U.S. War Crimes "Report
from Baghdad -- Winning Hearts and Minds"Report
from Fallujah -- Destroying a Town in Order to "Save" it"Report
from Baghdad -- Opening the Gates of Hell"War
on Terrorism" Makes Us All Less Safe Bush
-- Is the Tide Turning?Perle and
FrumIntelligence
Failure Kerry
vs. Dean SOU
2004: Myth and
Reality |